1 |
On 08/08/13 12:39, Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> On 7 August 2013 20:45, Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Greetings, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Gnome Herd decided to target stablilization of 3.8 [1] which requires |
6 |
>> systemd. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6, a version w/o this |
9 |
>> restriction, enabling all non systemd users to profit from this |
10 |
>> eye-candy as well. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> I raise the freedom of choice card here. And deliberately choosing an |
13 |
>> uncooperative version doesn't shine a good light. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> People are free to use a saner desktop environment... |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
/me points to XFCE that will *not* be removing ConsoleKit support, or |
19 |
require systemd |
20 |
(however I'm going to append systemd support to 4.10, but the patches |
21 |
currently available are sub-par and none in upstream git yet) |
22 |
|
23 |
does anyone know if Cinnamon, MATE, or whatever GNOME forks there are |
24 |
will keep ConsoleKit support or not? |
25 |
i'm not volunteering but I never really got why our GNOME maintainers |
26 |
insisted on staying with it instead of going with the distribution after |
27 |
it was clear logind is a dead end on non-systemd systemd |
28 |
|
29 |
- Samuli |