Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators)
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:40:08
Message-Id: CAGfcS_nRbuWNN=MAdH1C1ssjQFv40kXz2z5mUwMjSwiqx0=hBw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 2 of N: developer interaction (merge co-ordinators) by Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
> IMO we should try to be cutting down barriers from the git migration, > not throwing up more. The process has taken long enough already; the > desire to control everything about the migration is part of why it's > taken so long.
Fair enough. We should also be asking ourselves what happens if something goes really wrong and there are no commits for a whole two days. I think the answer is, not much. As long as there are a few devs who can tend to security issues or whatever I don't see it as an issue if we have the odd glitch. We do need to get the docs up so that we're at least somewhat harmonized on conventions (authors vs committers, and so on). Let's not burn the first person to make a mistake at the stake either... Rich

Replies