1 |
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> IMO we should try to be cutting down barriers from the git migration, |
3 |
> not throwing up more. The process has taken long enough already; the |
4 |
> desire to control everything about the migration is part of why it's |
5 |
> taken so long. |
6 |
|
7 |
Fair enough. |
8 |
|
9 |
We should also be asking ourselves what happens if something goes |
10 |
really wrong and there are no commits for a whole two days. I think |
11 |
the answer is, not much. As long as there are a few devs who can tend |
12 |
to security issues or whatever I don't see it as an issue if we have |
13 |
the odd glitch. |
14 |
|
15 |
We do need to get the docs up so that we're at least somewhat |
16 |
harmonized on conventions (authors vs committers, and so on). Let's |
17 |
not burn the first person to make a mistake at the stake either... |
18 |
|
19 |
Rich |