1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2009.06.08 16:48, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
5 |
[snip] |
6 |
|
7 |
> Very small point. There is a difference between "EAPI in the file |
8 |
> name |
9 |
> extension" and just "EAPI in the file name". I think the intent here |
10 |
> is |
11 |
> the latter, but it speaks of them interchangeably it seems. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Regards, |
14 |
> Ferris |
15 |
> -- |
16 |
> Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
17 |
> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |
18 |
> |
19 |
Ferris, |
20 |
|
21 |
Its not a small point, it makes quite a difference. In most places the |
22 |
glep should talk about "EAPI in the file name", not "EAPI in the file |
23 |
name extension". |
24 |
|
25 |
dev-zero got to me first on that and I need to update the glep. |
26 |
|
27 |
- -- |
28 |
Regards, |
29 |
|
30 |
Roy Bamford |
31 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
32 |
gentoo-ops |
33 |
forum-mods |
34 |
treecleaners |
35 |
trustees |
36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
38 |
|
39 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkotc4EACgkQTE4/y7nJvatWFwCeIyq5Ks/WzTUImTJXaoRQG5Pc |
40 |
x5QAnjOm+jfgQ5/3vBqJyPsRDOtc6YCF |
41 |
=yoel |
42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |