| 1 |
On Saturday 30 September 2006 15:14, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> It is not a change in policy. It's a codification of existing practice. |
| 3 |
The behaviour of portage seems to ask you to differ on this. But you also seem |
| 4 |
to lose your point. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'm discussing the change of behaviour with respect to portage, not the change |
| 7 |
to devmanual. Why am I not questioning the change to devmanual? Because the |
| 8 |
bug there is just required by Plasmaroo who act as a proxy between QA and |
| 9 |
devmanual itself, and thus not up to discuss anymore than a CVS commit. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But, the behaviour change for profiles (that currently, for bug or design, |
| 12 |
acts in a different way than your "existing practice" suggest) is up to |
| 13 |
debate, as I've found a few reasons not to back up such a change, and rather |
| 14 |
stick with the current behaviour. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
So, again, why should we change the behaviour, other than to fullfill your |
| 17 |
request? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ |
| 21 |
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |
Archives