1 |
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:25:02 +0100 |
2 |
"M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> .. That was quick ... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I swore there was something in the devmanual about a nice long period of |
7 |
> bikeshedding before changes to eclasses were approved .. |
8 |
|
9 |
The eclass writing and changes guide is described in devmanual and available |
10 |
at https://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/ |
11 |
|
12 |
Namely "Adding and Updating Eclasses" section includes rationale why one |
13 |
should consider that. TL;DR: The goal is to serve both as an announcement |
14 |
and as a chance to spot errors before affecting everyone. |
15 |
|
16 |
Valuable feedback (ideally actionable or supportive) feedback is important |
17 |
to community and individuals as it allows us all to make a step in the right |
18 |
direction. |
19 |
|
20 |
I view existence of bikeshedding centithreads (with zero valuable feedback) |
21 |
as a negative side of Gentoo community as it's a time sink. |
22 |
I suggest not to start and not to contribute to such threads. |
23 |
|
24 |
Unfortunately even rare snarky comments don't work all that well in mailing lists. |
25 |
|
26 |
Thanks for your patience and understanding :) |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
|
30 |
Sergei |