Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "PaweĊ‚ Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:01:09
Message-Id: 4E99F461.1050203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying by Dirkjan Ochtman
On 10/15/11 2:42 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 03:54, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: >> That would be an ok approach from my perspective: We could just change >> line 14 of python.eclass and let package maintainers report breakage as >> they increment EAPI. I am confident that nothing EAPI <= 3 would break. >> >> Is anyone (especially djc and the python herd members) opposed to this? > > Seems fine to me; I can't really think of a practical better way.
Thank you, change committed to CVS then. Hopefully nobody will get upset about this. I'll wait a few days before I start using EAPI-4 in ebuilds using python.eclass, but I've done local tests and everything works fine (for the ebuild I (co-)maintain).

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>