Archives
Archives
| From: | Alex Xu <alex_y_xu@×××××.ca> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:32:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | 52010907.7000008@yahoo.ca | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61) by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On 06/08/13 10:02 AM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 | > It seems none of them (except the overview GLEP 57) are implemented yet, |
| 3 | > although they are roughly 6-8 years old. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > What is holding it back? Is it just that we don't have a PM |
| 6 | > implementation yet or is it some political nonsense and PMS blocking |
| 7 | > progress again? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > I am not criticizing the portage team in any way here. I just want to |
| 10 | > push for some attention. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > -- |
| 14 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0057.html |
| 15 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0058.html |
| 16 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0059.html |
| 17 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0060.html |
| 18 | > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0061.html |
| 19 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64258 |
| 20 | > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/2709 |
| 21 | > |
| 22 | |
| 23 | AFAIK, the status is "unimplemented, and nobody's working on it". |
| 24 | |
| 25 | I believe that the reason is simply that nobody has done the work yet, |
| 26 | not due to bikeshedding. |
| 27 | |
| 28 | I agree that these should be implemented at a rate faster than the |
| 29 | current one (i.e. not at all). |
| 30 | |
| 31 | (FYI, you spelled "improvements" wrong. ;) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] status of security improvments (GLEPs 57-61) | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |