Archives
Archives
| From: | "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | ||
| Date: | Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:06:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 50A8F918.2010802@flameeyes.eu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" |
||
| 1 | On 18/11/2012 03:11, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > [Just asking because all you angry answers to some devs make me think |
| 4 | > that you're on SysD side, when tons of Gentoo users and Gentoo devs are |
| 5 | > on "non-SysD-related udev" side.] |
| 6 | |
| 7 | The fact you're asking means you really haven't been following anything |
| 8 | I've been doing lately. As many other developers can easily attest, I |
| 9 | don't use systemd and I'm not planning to use it anytime soon. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | So your whole rant picking up on my post is completely misdirected. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | And let this be a reminder that you can still disagree with the "systemd |
| 14 | everywhere, and only" crowd while still not becoming laughing stock. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 18 | flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] | "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <mva@×××.name> |