| 1 |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:35 AM <soap@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> From: David Seifert <soap@g.o> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> * Using the ninja backend as a default is the only way to |
| 6 |
> massively improve src_compile core utilization, given that |
| 7 |
> it seems unlikely that CMake will ever produce non-recursive |
| 8 |
> Makefiles. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I just want to bring your attention to this bug comment, which would |
| 11 |
indicate a regression in the kitware branch of ninja that I was asked |
| 12 |
to merge by the Gentoo cmake maintainers. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/663384#c1 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If this comment proves to have the right conclusion, I will likely |
| 17 |
revert back to the vanilla upstream codebase until the kitware branch |
| 18 |
can be fixed. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
This may effect your plans to enable ninja by default, since it will |
| 21 |
break any fortran package. |
Archives