Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:07:20
Message-Id: CAG2jQ8jdRk6itGb2Ro_wNmaHO1KCKWJL4HD_-gboxrFJLiD8oA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform by James Cloos
1 On 23 March 2013 19:52, James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> wrote:
2 >>>>>> "MC" == Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> writes:
3 >
4 > MC> # Removal in 30 days
5 > MC> app-text/cuneiform
6 >
7 > That one should not go. There are not enough quality ocr engines
8 > available, Gentoo needs to keep all of them.
9 >
10 > And a couple of bugs is never a sufficient reason to kick a package.
11 >
12 > -JimC
13 > --
14 > James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
15 >
16
17 Please do not reply to gentoo-dev-announce. The Reply-To was set for a reason.
18 The package is going away unless someone fixes the bugs and properly
19 maintains the package
20
21 I will not have this conversation again. You are always free to move
22 this package to an overlay.
23
24 --
25 Regards,
26 Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
27 http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>