1 |
On 12/06/2016 07:29 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 01:13:12PM -0500, james wrote: |
3 |
>> A while back, we we were promised an email channel for gentoo-proxy |
4 |
>> folks that did not get on well with IRC. It never materialized, |
5 |
> The mail alias proxy-maint@g.o (same alias as proxy-maintainers@) |
6 |
> has 22 people on it. It was created 2013/09/26. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The list gentoo-proxy-maint@l.g.o was created 2016/05/29. |
9 |
> I don't see much usage of it, nobody has emailed since August. |
10 |
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-proxy-maint/ |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The request for it was filed and tracked here: |
13 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> How exactly is that never materialized? |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
I subscribe on 6/23/2016:: |
20 |
|
21 |
From:: gentoo-proxy-maint+help@l.g.o |
22 |
|
23 |
gentoo-proxy-maint+help@l.g.o |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
Hi, this is the Mlmmj program managing the |
28 |
<gentoo-proxy-maint@l.g.o> mailing list. |
29 |
|
30 |
Somebody (and we hope it was you) has requested that your email address |
31 |
<garftd@×××××××.net> be added to the list, without mail delivery. This |
32 |
means you will not receive any posts to the list, but you are considered |
33 |
a member. This means, for instance, you are able to post to a list which |
34 |
only subscribers may post to, while you follow the list using a web |
35 |
archive or another subscribed email address. |
36 |
|
37 |
To confirm you want to do this, please send a message to |
38 |
<gentoo-proxy-maint+confsub-nomail-75dc5ad5188e6314-garftd=verizon.net@l.g.o> |
39 |
which can usually be done simply by replying to this message. The subject |
40 |
and the body of the message can be anything. |
41 |
|
42 |
After doing so, you should receive a reply informing you that the operation |
43 |
succeeded. |
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
And here is the reply:: |
47 |
|
48 |
gentoo-proxy-maint+confsub-nomail-75dc5ad5188e6314-garftd=verizon.net@l.g.o |
49 |
|
50 |
on 6/23/2016 10:21am |
51 |
|
52 |
................................................. |
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
So I just now sent email to : |
58 |
proxy-maint+subscribe@g.o |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
NO answer on this attempt. ON this page:: |
62 |
https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/all-lists.html |
63 |
|
64 |
All I see is: gentoo-proxy-maint |
65 |
|
66 |
Am I subscribe? Did I miss the exact syntax to get subscribed? |
67 |
|
68 |
Perhaps proxy-maint@g.o needs to be listed with the rest of |
69 |
the mailing lists? |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
let's see if that one goes through (nothing after 10 minutes). |
74 |
|
75 |
|
76 |
My goal is to read that list and publish documents on what is exactly |
77 |
needed to get dev status. I think it's not a good idea to force folks to |
78 |
use irc to learn about proxy-maint, get help on ebuilds when you need it |
79 |
so there should be a nice set of document and tests one can work |
80 |
through, without intervention. Then take the quizes and be treated like |
81 |
an outcast for a while, before being able to work the portage tree. I am |
82 |
not interested in anything core to gentoo. I am extremely |
83 |
interested in building minimized cluster ebuilds and wrapping them up |
84 |
in stage-4s for ease of installation. Really, nothing threatening at all. |
85 |
|
86 |
|
87 |
|
88 |
I already finished up both quiz, including the second(exit) one, but |
89 |
there was a few question that were incomplete. |
90 |
That was all right befor Goktuk did his revision work, so I'd like to |
91 |
answer the updated quized, as most of the questions, when I answered, |
92 |
were not even up to EAPI-5. Where are the quiz questions. |
93 |
|
94 |
|
95 |
Oh yea, I emailed those quizes timely to one of the devs I was working |
96 |
with, and got no answer. (sorry, not going to identify that dev). So I |
97 |
prefer to answer the latest quizes; you guys can figure out who I should |
98 |
send those to. |
99 |
|
100 |
|
101 |
|
102 |
|
103 |
I never got any mail from the list. I could see a few postings via |
104 |
gmane.org. Sure, gmane is mostly dysfunctional now. I never saw or any |
105 |
information on the second list.... |
106 |
|
107 |
|
108 |
James |