1 |
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit : |
2 |
> * Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> * Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This |
5 |
> doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that >=4.1 is being used |
6 |
> even if it's installed. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> * || ( ) deps, and hope that if the user has 4.1 installed then they're |
9 |
> using it. Since library implementations aren't runtime switchable, this |
10 |
> will lead to breakages if users upgrade gcc and then remove boost. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> None of these are particularly nice... |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Newbie idea : g++ and boost both provide virtual/tr1 |
16 |
|
17 |
Newbie question : besides the fact that you would have to rebuild |
18 |
packages if you changed the virtual, is there anything painfully obvious |
19 |
why that would be a bad idea ? |
20 |
|
21 |
Just a thought :) |
22 |
|
23 |
Rémi |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |