| 1 |
Gordon Malm wrote: |
| 2 |
> It looks to me like you've already made up your mind. How is hardened doing |
| 3 |
> the entirely wrong thing? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
From the page [1] you mentioned: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
"If so, that seems to me like an abuse of the -D option." |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The abuse is in changing the compiler behavior based on -D options. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> What do you propose can be done to "fix" the |
| 12 |
> hardened compiler? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
From the same page: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"It would be better for you to remove the patch from gcc where it makes |
| 17 |
-D__KERNEL__ imply -nossp -nopie, and to instead patch the Linux kernel |
| 18 |
build system (Makefiles, etc.) so that it passes "-D__KERNEL__ -nossp |
| 19 |
-nopie" rather than "-D__KERNEL__"." |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
[1] http://code.google.com/p/distcc/issues/detail?id=25 |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Cheers, |
| 24 |
-jkt |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives