1 |
Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 22:43:24 |
2 |
Dean Stephens <desultory@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 08/11/15 10:32, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > Hello, everyone. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Now that we're officially on git and can officially use pull |
8 |
> > requests to provide rapid community interaction, it'd be convenient |
9 |
> > to have a little better framework for pinging package maintainers. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > With the unofficial mirror/pull request project, I was either |
12 |
> > looking for project member GitHub accounts and pinging found |
13 |
> > project members by name, or talking to them directly on IRC. |
14 |
> > However, with the growth in number of pull requests this will |
15 |
> > become more and more inconvenient. Therefore, I think it's time to |
16 |
> > be able to mirror teams willing to work with GitHub community there |
17 |
> > for easier 'pings'. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I have two ideas right now: |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > 1. creating GitHub Gentoo project teams corresponding to willing |
22 |
> > Gentoo teams, |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > 2. preparing lists of GitHub usernames on project wiki pages. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Solution 1. is cleaner. In this case, we create GitHub teams under |
27 |
> > the Gentoo projects, and add appropriate Gentoo developers having |
28 |
> > GitHub accounts to the teams. Then, in PRs we can just ping the |
29 |
> > whole team like @Gentoo/Qt or like. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > Solution 2. avoids adding any GitHub teams. In this case, in team |
32 |
> > wiki page we collect team member usernames like "@Pesa, |
33 |
> > @kensington, ..." so we could copy-paste it to pull requests. We |
34 |
> > still require extra effort when 'assigning' PRs but at least I |
35 |
> > don't have to lookup the same people over and over again. |
36 |
> > |
37 |
> > With some Wiki people help, we could even implement updating |
38 |
> > GitHub teams automatically following Wiki member changes. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > Your thoughts? |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> Why not use LDAP? |
43 |
|
44 |
Because: |
45 |
|
46 |
a) LDAP is PITA, |
47 |
|
48 |
b) therefore almost nobody cares to update team listings except for |
49 |
occasional updates when they happen to need to change SSH keys or |
50 |
something, |
51 |
|
52 |
c) team listings in LDAP are cleartext and completely random. |
53 |
|
54 |
-- |
55 |
Best regards, |
56 |
Michał Górny |
57 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |