1 |
On 12/13/2009 02:49 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:44:05PM +1100, Daniel Black wrote: |
3 |
>> Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing |
4 |
>> CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us). |
5 |
>> https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence.html |
6 |
> That's a pretty dense license. I can see why you had a headache. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I believe that in it's current form, we will have to make sure we have a |
9 |
> liability disclaimer to users for the license, but that should be about |
10 |
> it. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
First, I am not a lawyer. |
14 |
|
15 |
The 3PV license does require that the user be presented with: |
16 |
http://www.cacert.org/policy/NRPDisclaimerAndLicence.php |
17 |
|
18 |
I'm not sure that simply posting the link in an einfo would satisfy the |
19 |
requirements. We might need to post the full text to qualify as having |
20 |
presented it to the user - not sure about that. I don't see anything in |
21 |
there that requires interaction though (hitting a yes button or anything |
22 |
like that). |
23 |
|
24 |
The license itself is fairly short - we only need to post the NRP and |
25 |
not the 3PV license. The 3PV is a license for Gentoo to distribute |
26 |
content to users under the NRP. Users who don't redistribute the key |
27 |
don't need to worry about it. |
28 |
|
29 |
An option would be to RESTRICT=mirror their root key, and install it |
30 |
directly from their site, assuming they don't start messing with the |
31 |
URL. Then we can just put the license in the ebuild like any other. |
32 |
Since we don't redistribute anything copyrighted, Gentoo itself doesn't |
33 |
enter into any license agreement. |
34 |
|
35 |
Only issue with that is that it is often bundled with a bunch of others |
36 |
and I don't know that you can restrict only one URL in the ebuild. |