| 1 |
On Wednesday 02 February 2011 23:34:07 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/02/2011 11:01 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.de>: |
| 6 |
> >> On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze: |
| 8 |
> >>>> It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 |
| 9 |
> >>>> because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it |
| 10 |
> >>>> would be beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for |
| 11 |
> >>>> arches that don't affect them at all. |
| 12 |
> >>>> |
| 13 |
> >>>> [...] |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Don't be so impatient...Debian users wait two years for a new major |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > version of KDE. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I know. Though Debian is not a rolling-release distro, like Gentoo is. |
| 20 |
> Don't get me wrong though; it's not that I'm impatient. I already |
| 21 |
> unmasked it here. I brought this up simply because it seemed like a |
| 22 |
> needless inefficiency that the popular arches get stalled by the less |
| 23 |
> popular ones. That's all really, so hopefully no one will read more |
| 24 |
> into it than there is. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
For the record, Kacper told me today that every developer is allowed to touch |
| 27 |
ppc/ppc64 profiles. Archies that don't want others to touch their profiles |
| 28 |
should mention it in the devmanual. I was not aware of that, I thought that |
| 29 |
!arch member is not allowed to touch arch-specific profiles. Anyway, KDE 4.6 |
| 30 |
will be unmasked tomorrow. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) |
| 33 |
Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays |
Archives