Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI)
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 15:38:12
Message-Id: 200712211635.34967.bo.andresen@zlin.dk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Use EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (.ebuild-EAPI) by Thomas Pani
1 On Thursday 20 December 2007 17:14:52 Thomas Pani wrote:
2 > > Are we Debian now? A new feature gets implemented (obviously because we
3 > > *need* it) and we can make use of it in a *year*?
4 >
5 > No, we're not Debian, thank god. I thought the "wait 1+ year" policy
6 > changed? Again citing Ciaran: "That was only the case because
7 > previously, using new features that Portage didn't support would cause
8 > horrible breakage. Now, instead, the ebuilds show up as being masked." [2]
9
10 It has changed as long as you don't introduce features that makes old versions
11 of portage fail to source the ebuild. EAPI=1 didn't do that.
12
13 --
14 Bo Andresen

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature