| 1 |
Roy Bamford ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> On 2006.10.21 09:02, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
>> we're going to have to cut off support for i386 targets starting with |
| 4 |
>> glibc-2.6 ... the upstream plans are to require TLS and i386 does not |
| 5 |
>> have |
| 6 |
>> the atomic instructions required to support it |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> some other implications ... the glibc-compat20 people will also be |
| 9 |
>> stuck with |
| 10 |
>> glibc-2.5 (as that implies no TLS support in linuxthreads) |
| 11 |
>> -mike |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Mike, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> "cut off" as in nothing for i386 or leave i386 at glibc-2.5? |
| 17 |
> Not that its matters much, there can't be many 80386 boxes running |
| 18 |
> Gentoo now. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> What is the lowest IA32 arch that will be supported ? |
| 21 |
> I'm looking for clarification because very often i386 is used to mean |
| 22 |
> anything < i686. I have a personal interest too. My server is a k6-2. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Regards, |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Roy Bamford |
| 27 |
> (NeddySeagoon) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
may be the time to add a new arch "386" ? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives