Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Heather <cynede@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mirroring Gentoo project/team members on GitHub
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:24:25
Message-Id: 55CB029C.4040706@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Mirroring Gentoo project/team members on GitHub by "Michał Górny"
1 2 cents from me in case of connection with contributions on github:
2
3 - Someone should automate mirroring for https://github.com/gentoo/gnome
4 - And review periodically pull requests there if there will be some...
5
6 On 11.08.2015 18:32, Michał Górny wrote:
7 > Hello, everyone.
8 >
9 > Now that we're officially on git and can officially use pull requests
10 > to provide rapid community interaction, it'd be convenient to have
11 > a little better framework for pinging package maintainers.
12 >
13 > With the unofficial mirror/pull request project, I was either looking
14 > for project member GitHub accounts and pinging found project members by
15 > name, or talking to them directly on IRC. However, with the growth in
16 > number of pull requests this will become more and more inconvenient.
17 > Therefore, I think it's time to be able to mirror teams willing to work
18 > with GitHub community there for easier 'pings'.
19 >
20 > I have two ideas right now:
21 >
22 > 1. creating GitHub Gentoo project teams corresponding to willing Gentoo
23 > teams,
24 >
25 > 2. preparing lists of GitHub usernames on project wiki pages.
26 >
27 > Solution 1. is cleaner. In this case, we create GitHub teams under
28 > the Gentoo projects, and add appropriate Gentoo developers having
29 > GitHub accounts to the teams. Then, in PRs we can just ping the whole
30 > team like @Gentoo/Qt or like.
31 >
32 > Solution 2. avoids adding any GitHub teams. In this case, in team wiki
33 > page we collect team member usernames like "@Pesa, @kensington, ..." so
34 > we could copy-paste it to pull requests. We still require extra effort
35 > when 'assigning' PRs but at least I don't have to lookup the same
36 > people over and over again.
37 >
38 > With some Wiki people help, we could even implement updating GitHub
39 > teams automatically following Wiki member changes.
40 >
41 > Your thoughts?
42 >