1 |
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 03:40:02PM +0200, Marek Szuba wrote: |
2 |
> Dear everyone, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Following some private discussions, I feel quite strongly now that it |
5 |
> would both considerably improve certain processes and make our use of |
6 |
> limited manpower more efficient were we to further reduce the number of |
7 |
> stable arches in Gentoo Linux. Specifically, I propose to drop |
8 |
> - hppa, |
9 |
> - ppc, |
10 |
> - sparc, |
11 |
> - x86 |
12 |
> to ~arch-only status. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Note that this does NOT mean we intend to drop support for those arches |
15 |
> altogether. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> There are IMHO several good reasons for this: |
18 |
> - most of the arches from this list are quite dated and either aren't |
19 |
> really developed upstream any more or got superseded by newer ones (for |
20 |
> the record, it's been 18 years since the first amd64 CPUs came out) |
21 |
> - we have got very few people actually supporting these arches, and in |
22 |
> case of hppa there is also the hardware bottleneck. Subsequently, |
23 |
> stabilisation requests often take a long time to resolve |
24 |
> - feedback we receive, e.g. by Bugzilla, suggests that Gentoo on at |
25 |
> least some of these arches have got very, very few users |
26 |
> - last but by no means least, my personal experience from the last |
27 |
> several years suggests that running ~arch is reasonably trouble-free |
28 |
> these days |
29 |
> |
30 |
> WDYT? |
31 |
|
32 |
For the record, I'm fine with this. |
33 |
|
34 |
x86 being on the list sort of caught my attention, but it does seem to |
35 |
fall into the superceeded category, so it should be fine. |
36 |
|
37 |
Even though running ~arch may be mostly trouble-free, this isn't really |
38 |
relevant to the discussion imo. If you run ~arch, you should be prepared |
39 |
for possible breakage at any time and be able to recover from it. |
40 |
|
41 |
William |