Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc:	Christian Ruppert <idl0r@g.o>
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow
Date:	Sun, 06 Mar 2011 12:48:59
Message-Id:	`AANLkTin99E9xMv0BKCd6pmiN9v3wyLTyeWsRZbDtnSSv@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-dev] Bugzilla - New Default Status Workflow by Christian Ruppert

1	On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Christian Ruppert <idl0r@g.o> wrote:
2	> Hey guys,
3	>
4	> in bugzilla-4.x they did change the "Status Workflow"[1].
5	>
6	[snip]
7	>
8	> We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for bugs.gentoo.org.
9	> So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to keep the old?
10	>
11
12	I'm not attached to the names we use for the various bug statuses. I
13	would suggest that we follow the path that makes things easiest for
14	future maintenance and upgrades.
15
16	As for the removal of REOPENED, I guess that information will still be
17	visible via the "bug history" button? It shouldn't be a problem then.
18
19	--
20	~Nirbheek Chauhan
21
22	Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team