Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: dev-random@××××.ru
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:11:05
Message-Id: 20100627181027.GA19713@laptop
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages by Nikos Chantziaras
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> ... > It is allowed. Section 7.1.1, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the C++ standard: > ...
Not in C. ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (aka C99), section 6.7.1, note 101:
> The implementation may treat any register declaration simply as an auto > declaration. However, whether or not addressable storage is actually > used, the address of any part of an object declared with storage-class > specifier register cannot be computed, either explicitly (by use of the > unary & operator as discussed in 6.5.3.2) or implicitly (by converting > an array name to a pointer as discussed in 6.3.2.1). Thus, the only > operator that can be applied to an array declared with storage-class > specifier register is sizeof.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>