| 1 |
On Thursday 30 October 2003 13:08, splite-gentoo@××××××××××××××××.edu wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:17:57AM -0800, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 3 |
> The Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux (ifc) is definitely not an |
| 4 |
> unrestricted download. You may download and use the compiler under a |
| 5 |
> no-cost |
| 6 |
> "Non-Commercial Unsupported" license* that essentially covers running |
| 7 |
> it on your home computer for your own amusement. (I'm not sure how many |
| 8 |
> people use BLAS or LAPACK strictly for their own amusement. :) Paid |
| 9 |
> academics (faculty, grad students) aren't covered, even if their research |
| 10 |
> is not for profit. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Hm, thanks for clarification! (having not dealt with ifc itself, just testing |
| 13 |
blass libs and seeing how it was automatically pulled off the mirrors I |
| 14 |
assumed it is less restricted.) |
| 15 |
So, shouldn't the ifc ebuild be fetch-restricted then (just like the icc one)? |
| 16 |
Doesn't Intel want to enforce a usual click-through thing (to which this page |
| 17 |
actually points)? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
George |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives