| 1 |
On 31/10/12 09:50, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 30-10-2012 23:22:01 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> So exactly what is (your) problem with the current eclass now? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Your eclass pretends to support Prefix, but it is broken in that |
| 6 |
> respect, and because some other eclass does it the same way (your |
| 7 |
> claim), you refuse to fix it. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm not refusing anything. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't do prefix and I'm _always_ expecting a patch from prefix@ for |
| 14 |
prefix issues. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Thanks for volunteering. I'll be looking forward in seeing the patch. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- Samuli |
Archives