Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage2 super USE flag suggestin
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:29:50
Message-Id: 38200.216.190.203.135.1027016989.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage2 super USE flag suggestin by Alexander Gretencord
1 You don't have to put a minus in front of everything. In make.conf, put
2 USE="-* <your use settings here>". Then you will only get exactly what you
3 asked for.
4
5 For those who have said they aren't sure if the -* works, I've tested it,
6 and it does.
7
8 Alexander Gretencord said:
9 > On Thursday 18 July 2002 17:55, maciek@×××××××.net wrote:
10 >> However, a simpler solution would be to introduce some priority
11 >> of USE flags. "-X" would also say -gtk because gtk depends on X. Then,
12 >> we could eventually introduce f.e. "sound" use flag and make alsa,
13 >> oss... dependant on it.
14 >
15 > USE Flags only work on _optional_ dependencies. GTK+ needs X so it doesn't
16 > matter if you have -X in your USE flag GTK+ still needs X even if you
17 > don't want X. So if you want GTK+ you _have_ to install X.
18 >
19 > I think the "more make.defaults files" solution is the best. It sucks to
20 > first have to see through the make.defaults, copy everything and put a -
21 > in front of nearly every word just to get a server up and running without
22 > X :)
23 >
24 > Alex
25 >
26 > --
27 > "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
28 > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
29 > Benjamin Franklin
30 >
31 > _______________________________________________
32 > gentoo-dev mailing list
33 > gentoo-dev@g.o
34 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev