| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:59:53 +0100
|
| 5 |
Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> If depgraph is to be found broken for such architecture it is |
| 7 |
> shadowed (or treated as without keywords, whatever we find to like in |
| 8 |
> our implementation in package manager) and not permitted to be |
| 9 |
> emerged on said architecture. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
...but that would mean calculating dependencies for a package before
|
| 12 |
you can figure out whether or not it's masked, which you *really* don't
|
| 13 |
want to have to do.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
- --
|
| 16 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 18 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iEYEARECAAYFAk1BtD4ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGPcwCguaHVnJhrx2yMeP0xNG1um5QY
|
| 21 |
4VIAn3EbgCwSEOMZdC+musaLnaKMrDMH
|
| 22 |
=Sxc/
|
| 23 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives