1 |
El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 10:31 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: |
2 |
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 06:39 +1000, Michael escribió: |
4 |
> >> On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
5 |
> >> > On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see |
6 |
> >> > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134 |
7 |
> >> > |
8 |
> >> > Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible |
9 |
> >> > idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken* |
10 |
> >> > since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example. |
11 |
> >> > |
12 |
> >> > Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses |
13 |
> >> > epatch! |
14 |
> >> > |
15 |
> >> > -Alexandre Rostovtsev. |
16 |
> >> > |
17 |
> >> > |
18 |
> >> > |
19 |
> >> Since eutils inherits multilib and user, the breakage extends beyond epatch. |
20 |
> >> For example, I just saw bug #417153, where a user reported failed calls |
21 |
> >> to enew{user,group}. |
22 |
> >> |
23 |
> >> |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > The autotools.eclass change should probably be reverted until things are |
27 |
> > properly checked I think (and I will do it tomorrow if nobody disagrees) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> It is far too late to do that. What is done is done. Let try and fix |
30 |
> what is still broken |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Regards, |
33 |
> Markos |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
But we still have no idea what kind of commands provided by eutils and |
38 |
eclasses inheritted by it are now missing, epatch usage was fixes, |
39 |
enewgroup/user will probably be done but... other missing commands could |
40 |
still appear in the tree :| |