Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:19:56
Message-Id: 201110122019.02773.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Samuli Suominen
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:58:31 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > >>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. > >> > >> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the > >> tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the > >> depgraph. > > > > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. > > I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scary.
this isn't helping the conversation -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies