Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:52:11
Message-Id: 52148D5E.1080704@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies by "Manuel Rüger"
1 21.08.2013 13:17, Manuel Rüger пишет:
2 >
3 > Security team could maintain its own p.accept_keywords in profiles/ and
4 > add testing keyworded ebuilds that fix security issues there.
5 > Users who are interested skipping the stabilization process could link
6 > it into their /etc/portage/p.accept_keywords directory.
7
8 No, it is not an option. Masking current stable because it is broken was
9 not successful also(i heard, that this was usual practice earlier).
10 Please, let's not reinvent the wheel around evident problem: lack of
11 manpower.
12
13 Easing stabilization procedure makes stable more, well, unstable.
14 Bringing some workarounds like this brokes consistency of keywording.
15 Keywords are things, that chosen by user. Overlays maintains keywords
16 lists, yeah, but that can be reasonable only on vast amount of
17 packages(like KDE).
18
19 As i said earlier, we should recruit more people -> then problem will go
20 away. Both for security(that have a VAST amount of work, that i am
21 saying as a rookie security developer :-)) and arch teams.
22
23 --
24 Best regards, Sergey Popov
25 Gentoo developer
26 Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead
27 Gentoo Qt project lead
28 Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies Wyatt Epp <wyatt.epp@×××××.com>