1 |
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> At least the numbers for the year sound like something we will want to |
4 |
> deal with; from there, we could try to keep half a year low. And after |
5 |
> a while, we might end up ensuring stabilization within 3 months. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That's still three times more than our intended stabilization delay... |
8 |
> |
9 |
I think it'd be more interesting to know how many of these stable |
10 |
requests DON'T have blockers or other issues attached that prevent(ed) |
11 |
them from getting stabled. |
12 |
|
13 |
Also, at the older ages, how many of them are obsoleted by a newer |
14 |
version in the tree and should be closed (or even how many have been |
15 |
treecleaned)? |
16 |
|
17 |
-Wyatt |