Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:33:14
Message-Id: 20120605212815.079db021@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-portage-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue by "Aaron W. Swenson"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:44:08 -0400
5 "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> wrote:
6 > "There's never anything important in all that text." - Anonymous
7 > Gentoo User
8
9 To be fair, most einfo and elog messages are useless spam. When elog
10 was introduced, it was supposed to be only for *important* messages,
11 but nearly everything sent to it now is a waste of users' time.
12
13 Perhaps the solution is to implement an ethisisimportanthonestlog
14 function, and require developers to get approval before using it, as
15 per news items.
16
17 - --
18 Ciaran McCreesh
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iEYEARECAAYFAk/Oa+MACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHDhwCgpf1C/k//ecx21gcsCiCy6MK1
23 GRwAoNhvMaJSFxAbTdOGcqMcYhI5JuXN
24 =SNPn
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----