Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:30:21
Message-Id: 4FBCE5EE.9070708@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by "Andreas K. Huettel"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/23/2012 09:25 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> >> Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to >> RESO/WONT-FIX "testing git-cvsserver", make a "clean cut" and >> remove this bug from the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration >> to git". >> > > +1 > > Please cut cvs support once and for all. >
+1 for clean cut -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+85e4ACgkQVxOqA9G7/aDWpgD/SYfC3aOlOP2kAwK3qt81smH8 YWs60Kl77Xx+wIM1jx8A/0PkisxPTsLE5jR59GhaDmC+epoodW1GOak//pAvCmCG =F8Rw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@g.o>