Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] forcing recent patch-2.6.1 everywhere
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:40:08
Message-Id: 4FB561BC.30300@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] forcing recent patch-2.6.1 everywhere by Samuli Suominen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/17/2012 04:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 11:00 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 05/17/2012 03:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> any complaints ? -mike >>> >>> Index: profiles/base/packages >>> =================================================================== >>> >>> >> >>>
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages,v
>>> retrieving revision 1.62 diff -u -p -r1.62 packages --- >>> profiles/base/packages 12 Mar 2012 09:13:37 -0000 1.62 >>> +++ profiles/base/packages 17 May 2012 19:50:49 -0000 @@ >>> -61,7 +61,7 @@ #*sys-devel/libtool #*sys-devel/m4 >>> *sys-devel/make -*sys-devel/patch +*>=sys-devel/patch-2.6.1 >>> *sys-fs/e2fsprogs *virtual/dev-manager *virtual/editor >> >> What's the advantage/reward? > > <patch-2.6.1 fails if patch contains DOS -line endings, like the > ones you get from some crappy pastebin services or Trac's > webservice > >> =patch-2.6.1 doesn't have this problem, and this is what >> developers are > using anyway > > so less breakage, no possibility of these things slipping by > > consistent behavior > > profit! > > - Samuli >
I'm in! +1 - - Aaron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk+1YbwACgkQVxOqA9G7/aCGtAD/TpWZt3OVe+3rvqupbJrd8hWu TMYOHCGLhqqaIb8B2AABAIaq5UsEciS9A9PYiE23rwDuWzfZQts+WX06Rugc7Rkk =QgUZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----