Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: FW: [gentoo-dev] Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc)
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 16:48:24
Message-Id: 20030316174816.16824aed.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: FW: [gentoo-dev] Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc) by Todd Wright
begin  quote
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:23:26 +1100
"Todd Wright" <wylie@××××××××××.org> wrote:

> The ebuild I mentioned in the original post to this thread did state > what had changed. In this case it was primarily the software version > and some minor changes to cater for changes in the way it compiled. I > can understand your frustration at users submitting an ebuild with no > indication of what changed, however that was not what this thread was > intended to discuss.
<SNIP> I stand corrected. //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end