| 1 |
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 22:45, Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I know the UnionFS developer offline. I will ask him what the status of |
| 3 |
> unionFS is the next time I see him. :) |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Unionfs patchset is regularly released for new kernels, and bugs are |
| 6 |
fixed. I wouldn't call the project "dead", I would call it "mature" |
| 7 |
and "stable". I am not aware of the current state of affairs wrt. |
| 8 |
Unionfs vs. aufs, and whether the propaganda at unionfs.org still |
| 9 |
holds water, though. Too bad that there is no stacking filesystem in |
| 10 |
the mainline kernel. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Maxim Kammerer |
| 14 |
Liberté Linux (discussion / support: http://dee.su/liberte-contribute) |
Archives