| 1 |
Le 03/09/2009 23:10, Mounir Lamouri a écrit : |
| 2 |
> Duncan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Sebastian Pipping posted on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:21:49 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>> However I do notice that "GPL-2+" could make things easier. Why not |
| 7 |
>>> introduce a license group for it like @GPL-2+ or so, instead? That would |
| 8 |
>>> be transparent and use existing means. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> I've always thought Gentoo needed "plus" versions of the versioned |
| 12 |
>> licenses, anyway. GPL-2, GPL-2+, GPL-3, and GPL-3+, should all be |
| 13 |
>> different licenses, because really, they are. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> AFAIK, GPL-2 and GPL-2+ are not different, may you tell me more about that ? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
GPL-2+ means "GPL-2 GPL-3 GPL-4 ..." |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Not quite the same thing as just "GPL-2" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Rémi |
Archives