Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:26:50
Message-Id: 4FBD392B.3010800@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass) by "Michał Górny"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 05/20/2012 03:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen
6 > <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
7 >
8 >> ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass
9 >> modification today.
10 >
11 > I will repeat once again: autogenerate them.
12 >
13
14 +1
15
16 I think it is nice to be able to use a different changelog entry than
17 commit message, but autogenerated entries would be more consistent.
18
19 Having ChangeLog files at all is just a convenience, but an important
20 one imo. It's the quickest way to track down sudden breakage.
21
22 scm comments are _not_ the same as a single file holding information
23 on all changes to an entire directory.
24
25
26 As for the given case I demand that the missing ChangeLog entries will
27 be added now by vapier, cause it seems they have already caused
28 breakage: #417265
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
31 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
32
33 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvTkrAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzG5UIAIKFaGAXYGiyLBwbeQ1QxdlD
34 wndZJIXN9pWwDU/F3uyKqmHqNC1Aqf7U7g88ue/1FhSSyJeG+rEH1Qmym0Eb3fIe
35 hECZKWHMV/CDe2VhgGZ+dKvq3Pxz/nGt994NurLbBRWPCY2md63M45+499gb32w0
36 5wpYcH8vXw/noHvfw4o77Pwzu+5yphDWycOFtrc/UWIK0NXQZLzalnYqwl2HjHKE
37 vRWn/eAcTL+TzkS/pM7RI4BCROl3Rmk+jmkgeIOAlVlcpYEa41FB5wv7t3HdGM3i
38 AWiQySQ8iKehH4Blr97czn30hqekI6ACD08hEhiFZeA7JJYRT4ziYS1lapBzGFk=
39 =u07L
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>