Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 14
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 08:51:47
Message-Id: 1241599901.17083.12.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 7 by "Tiziano Müller"
1 Updated meeting agenda can be found here:
2
3 http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/council/meeting-agenda-20090514.txt
4
5 Changes:
6 - Added the issue of removing old eclasses to the list.
7
8 Cheers,
9 Tiziano
10
11 Am Sonntag, den 03.05.2009, 23:47 +0200 schrieb Tiziano Müller:
12 > This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd & 4th
13 > Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
14 > irc.freenode.net) !
15 >
16 > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
17 > on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
18 > list to see.
19 >
20 > For more info on the Gentoo Council, feel free to browse our homepage:
21 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/
22 >
23 > Following is the preliminary meeting agenda. It consists of two EAPI-3
24 > related topics as well as two almost rusty topics where we should
25 > finally make a decision to be able to move on.
26 >
27 >
28 > EAPI 3: Short discussion of the progress
29 > ----------------------------------------
30 >
31 > zmedico will provide an update on the progress of the implementation.
32 > Short discussion of problems and implementation decisions if needed.
33 >
34 >
35 > EAPI 3: PMS approval
36 > --------------------
37 >
38 > Goal: Approve EAPI-3 extension of the PMS. Any open questions should be
39 > on the mailing list before the meeting.
40 >
41 >
42 > GLEP 54: Dealing with live SCM packages
43 > ---------------------------------------
44 >
45 > Goal: Since no consensus is reached or progress has been made voting
46 > seems appropriate.
47 >
48 >
49 > Handling EAPI versioning in a forwards-compatible way
50 > -----------------------------------------------------
51 >
52 > Goal: Since no consensus is reached vote on the implementation for the
53 > problem solved in GLEP 55.
54 >
55 >
56 > Handling static libraries more flexibly
57 > ---------------------------------------
58 >
59 > Goal: Decision-making by consensus.
60 > Should we move forward with USE=static-libs to control
61 > building of static libraries? Should/Must this be an EAPI feature?
62 >
63 >
64 > Define EAPI development/deployment cycles
65 > -----------------------------------------
66 >
67 > Goal: Start discussion about EAPI development/deployment. For example:
68 > Collect problems of eapi introductions in the past, like reverting
69 > ebuilds to former eapis to get them stable, not waiting for the pm
70 > support a certain eapi before requesting stable keywords for ebuilds
71 > using the new eapi, .... Collect problems of EAPI development like
72 > feature-freeze, late feature removals (due to implementation problems).
73 > Eventually develop a lightweight EAPI development model.
74 >
75 >
76 > Cheers,
77 > Tiziano
78
79 --
80 Tiziano Müller
81 Gentoo Linux Developer, Council Member
82 Areas of responsibility:
83 Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin, GLEP Editor
84 E-Mail : dev-zero@g.o
85 GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature