| 1 |
On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:48:58 -0400 |
| 2 |
Richard Yao <ryao@×××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I want to add freebsd_get_cpuarch() to freebsd.eclass. This will give |
| 5 |
> us a platform-independent way of generating MACHINE_CPUARCH, which |
| 6 |
> will make building FreeBSD components on other platforms (i.e. Linux |
| 7 |
> and Prefix) easier. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> --- freebsd.eclass.old 2012-07-01 19:15:56.157277000 -0400 |
| 10 |
> +++ freebsd.eclass 2012-07-01 19:44:08.093698000 -0400 |
| 11 |
> @@ -58,6 +58,24 @@ freebsd_get_bmake() { |
| 12 |
> echo "${bmake}" |
| 13 |
> } |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> +freebsd_get_cpuarch() { |
| 16 |
> + local arch=$(uname -m) |
| 17 |
> + case $(uname -m) in |
| 18 |
> + x86_64) |
| 19 |
> + return 'amd64';; |
| 20 |
> + arm*) |
| 21 |
> + return 'arm';; |
| 22 |
> + i?86) |
| 23 |
> + return 'i386';; |
| 24 |
> + ppc*) |
| 25 |
> + return 'powerpc';; |
| 26 |
> + mips*) |
| 27 |
> + return 'mips';; |
| 28 |
> + sparc*) |
| 29 |
> + return 'sparc';; |
| 30 |
> + *) |
| 31 |
> + return arch; |
| 32 |
> + esac |
| 33 |
> +} |
| 34 |
> + |
| 35 |
> freebsd_do_patches() { |
| 36 |
> if [[ ${#PATCHES[@]} -gt 1 ]] ; then |
| 37 |
> for x in "${PATCHES[@]}"; do |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Does anyone have any objections? |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
hu? yes, as already pointed out, uname is not reliable when |
| 43 |
cross-compiling. You should use CHOST, and then you get tc-arch-kernel. |
| 44 |
See freebsd-lib ebuild for how it is handled. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
A. |
Archives