From: | Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | ||
Date: | Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:41:19 | ||
Message-Id: | b38c6f4c0610310736h2570a547uae0a99610639b0c8@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Ciaran McCreesh |
1 | On 10/31/06, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
2 | > Uh, security bugs are not the highest priority. |
3 | |
4 | Would it be possible to have some arch team leaders join in this |
5 | debate? Atm, it just seems to be bouncing back and forwards between |
6 | package maintainers asking questions, and a Gentoo user filling the |
7 | void left by the responses from the arch team folks. |
8 | |
9 | (Or, to put it another way, I'm not sure anyone's actually learning |
10 | anything here, except for Ciaran's personal opinions on how he'd like |
11 | things to be). |
12 | |
13 | Many thanks, |
14 | Stu |
15 | -- |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | Jason Wever <weeve@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees | "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o> |