From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? | ||
Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:34:53 | ||
Message-Id: | 4EADD0CF.70601@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? by Mike Frysinger |
1 | On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 | > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, |
3 | > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for |
4 | > keeping these before i punt them ? |
5 | > -mike |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break |
9 | backwards compatibility as long as an eclass exists? |
10 | |
11 | Regards, |
12 | Petteri |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |