Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:18:41
Message-Id: 201110122018.03219.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 19:27:41 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Mike Frysinger schrieb: > >> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. > > > > by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the > > tree with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the > > depgraph. > > The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before.
which is what i said -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies