1 |
On 11/26/11 11:29 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:15:53 +0100 |
3 |
> ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> This shouldn't be allowed, should it? The package is keyworded only |
6 |
>> ~x86, and I'm adding amd64 stable keyword, and repoman doesn't complain. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It would need to fetch latest CVS file from server to check against previous state. |
9 |
> I don't think repoman does any network IO safe updating metadata.dtd. |
10 |
|
11 |
Why does it warn about going straight to stable for _new_ ebuilds? Is it |
12 |
because it knows locally that it's a new file, and because of that |
13 |
doesn't need to connect to network? That'd make sense. |
14 |
|
15 |
Would it be possible to add repoman checks (possibly behind a special |
16 |
flag) that could use "cvs diff" results? |