Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:01:12
Message-Id: 20100312170300.013fb8e3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200
2 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording
5 > bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in
6 > question but there's a difference of opinion here:
7 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=272160#c5
8 > Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here:
9 > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html
10 > I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch
11 > team is the one in charge.
12
13 I swear there used to be a piece of documentation that said that the final
14 arch on a stabilization bug should be assigned and the maintainer moved to
15 CC. I can't find it any more, but that's probably where this idea came
16 from. It never really made sense to me but I've done it on several occasions.
17
18
19 --
20 fonts, by design, by neglect
21 gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect
22 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies