| 1 |
On Friday 15 June 2012 12:54:16 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:11:44 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 06/15/12 09:32, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > It is a little confusing when the function reports .a removal when |
| 5 |
> > > no such file exists. Also, explain why the file is removed. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Why keep the "-f"? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> For rm? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> -f, --force |
| 12 |
> ignore nonexistent files and arguments, never prompt |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The second part is still valid. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
i think his point was that since you just did a [[ -f ]] test, there shouldn't |
| 17 |
really be any cases where the rm would fail, so you could change the `rm -f` |
| 18 |
to `rm || die` ... |
| 19 |
-mike |
Archives