| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> On 22:21 Fri 12 Sep , Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I do know how to get around it, I did state that in my original email. |
| 4 |
>> As it happens we are having a discussion on gentoo-java mailing list on |
| 5 |
>> whether we should use icedtea-<openjdk build>.<icedtea version>.ebuild |
| 6 |
>> or have different packages for the different slots. One of the upstream |
| 7 |
>> authors argues for the icedtea6 approach but to me it seems a bit |
| 8 |
>> Debianish but I agree with him on that 6.09.1.2 is not that clean either. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I also agree that it's not clean. Perhaps you could encourage your |
| 11 |
> friendly upstream developers to have a versioning system that doesn't |
| 12 |
> suck? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Well if we strictly follow upstream naming and versioning then we don't |
| 16 |
need the two part version numbers but end up with packages named icedtea |
| 17 |
and icedtea6. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Regards, |
| 20 |
Petteri |
Archives