Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gnome-panel wants to downgrade...
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:16:29
Message-Id: 44689.216.190.203.130.1048007788.squirrel@squirrelmail.kydance.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gnome-panel wants to downgrade... by Jon Portnoy
Yeah, but it should show the version that it's actually upgrading, not the
version that's in a different SLOT. Maybe I'll take a look at the Portage
code, and come up with a patch later.

Jon Portnoy said:
> Recent versions of Portage will show UD for packages that're actually > going to be downgraded and just U when they're in different SLOTs, I > think. > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:56:52AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote: >> Then I'd like to propose a new feature for portage. ;) >> >> There is no visual indication in the output of emerge -pu world that >> tells me those are in different slots. And since I apparently still have >> a 1.4 panel version installed, shouldn't it show /that/ as the package >> it's upgrading? >> >> Jon Portnoy said: >> > It's safe. They're in different SLOTs. >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:50:13AM -0700, Matthew Walker wrote: >> >> Is there some reason gnome-panel wants to downgrade from version >> 2.2.1 to version 1.4.2-r2? Is it safe to let it downgrade? >> >> >> >> I've been avoiding letting portage 'update' gnome-panel for a while >> now, but I'm getting tired of it, and want to know what I should do. >> >> >> >> Matthew >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list >> > >> > -- >> > Jon Portnoy >> > >> > -- >> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list >> >> >> >> >> -- >> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list > > -- > Jon Portnoy > > -- > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
-- gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Using SLOTS (gtk+) john huttley <john@××××××.nz>