| 1 |
21.08.2013 22:28, Alexis Ballier пишет: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Instead of dropping them entirely to ~arch, maybe something in between |
| 4 |
> could be done: Said arches could start moving to ~arch the leaf and |
| 5 |
> less important packages. E.g. we have (had?) a lot of sparc keywords on |
| 6 |
> sound packages or ppc keywords on ocaml ones because at some point |
| 7 |
> (~10 years ago) some dev was interested in these on this architecture |
| 8 |
> but I'm pretty sure nobody uses them. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> In short: Reduce stable coverage to reduce the workload. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Also, from what I've seen in the thread, you are talking about keywords |
| 13 |
> only, right ? Do these arches keep their stable mark in profiles.desc? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I like this way much more. Let's clarify stabilization policy for some |
| 17 |
minor arches, e.g. policy about stabilization requests for huge |
| 18 |
packages. Cause dropping entire arch to ~arch maybe sometimes a bit |
| 19 |
overkill. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, Sergey Popov |
| 22 |
Gentoo developer |
| 23 |
Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead |
| 24 |
Gentoo Qt project lead |
| 25 |
Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead |
Archives