Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | ||
| Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 18:11:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFC54GrQPj5WWPd1HFtxUB__qozRREqdqnTjOB_jQso+MQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On 27 September 2013 05:57, Ciaran McCreesh |
| 2 | <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > virtual/perl-* is self-inflicted. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | How would you recommend it? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Like for instance, we really do need virtuals ( or equivalent ) for many |
| 10 | things in there, because those things may stop being part of dev-lang/perl |
| 11 | at a future time. One such example is Module-Build, which means any |
| 12 | packages that require Module-Build and don't declare virtual/Module-Build |
| 13 | in their dependency will be broken somewhere after perl 5.20 |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Kent |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Martin Vaeth <vaeth@××××××××××××××××××××××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |