Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:24:40
Message-Id: 20061107174728.064de822@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November by Alin Nastac
1 On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 18:52:04 +0200 Alin Nastac <mrness@g.o>
2 wrote:
3
4 | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 | > Kurt didn't back up his views back then. Rather typically, he just
6 | > told Method that he disagreed and that he wasn't going to budge no
7 | > matter what anyone said...
8 | >
9 | In the year 2005, the only gentoo-core discussion related to SPF was
10 | between me and lcars.
11 | Probably you are talking about an IRC conversation.
12
13 Nope, looks like it was just a bit earlier than 2005. The post you want
14 to read is:
15
16 From: Joshua Brindle <method@g.o>
17 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:30:37 -0400
18 Subject: Re: [gentoo-core] gentoo's policy on sender id (-infras use of
19 spf)
20
21 Along with the rest of the thread. Notice in particular how Joshua
22 claims that Kurt has never justified using SPF, and how in replies he
23 refuses to do so.
24
25 --
26 Ciaran McCreesh
27 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
28 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
29 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>